Home > Archive > BizTalk > microsoft.public.biztalk.general > 2004-06   Shop / Science   Privacy   

Re: Which Is Better?

From: Valery Pryamikov (Valery_at_nospam.harper.no)
Date: 06/10/04

  • Next message: Per Christoffer: "Biztalk 2000 Database timeout"
    Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:35:13 +0200
    

    Hi,
    Orchestration with few dynamic ports (one per adapter) would be the best
    choice for that kind of tasks.

    -Valery.
    http://www.harper.no/valery

    "Dwight Goins" <dngoins@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:%23jZe0HnTEHA.3420@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
    >I have a student who wants to do some basic Content Based Routing, However
    > she has multiple locations that she needs to send the message to.
    >
    > She has over 100+ different locations to send the message to with
    > different
    > types of adapters to use. This will be a maintenance nightmare, however
    > the
    > most efficient from what she hears.
    >
    > The question is, which is better, 1 orchestration to do content base
    > routing
    > to dynamically route it to these different locations using a custom
    > adapter
    > is need be, or just creating and managing over 100 send ports and using
    > the
    > filter for routing the messages.?
    >
    > She knows that Content Based routing is done with the Send Port with the
    > filter property, however She forsees it being a maintenance nightmare to
    > manage 100+ schemas, binded to 100+ send ports, and whenever something
    > changes it all changes. Does anyone have any more ideas on how to do
    > something like this?
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    >


  • Next message: Per Christoffer: "Biztalk 2000 Database timeout"
  • Home > Archive > BizTalk > microsoft.public.biztalk.general > 2004-06   Shop / Science   Privacy   
    This document was last modified: 06/11/04 02:18 CEST
    We are proud to be hosted by
    9 Net Avenue Deutschland