Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: rick <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2021 15:41:01 -0700
I don't think it is UPNP because I can use the VPN server, and RWW, which are
both using UPNP to forward the ports to 10.10.10.2. I have run the connect
to internet wizard, I don't have ISA installed yet. When I created the
domain.com zone it automatically used my internal nic ip and subnet for all
the records. I configured the dns server so it would listen on all
interfaces...I will have to try removing the router tomorrow. I tried
putting the external nics ip in dns for the NS, SOA... but it didn't seem to
work, I don't know if it was confused since I still have the internal records
in there
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
I don't have a lot of experience with UPNP,.
Have you run the connect to the internet wizard?
Is ISA installed?? (don't think it was)
To find out if its your router, remove it and assign the static IP to your
external nic. Then try
--
Cris E. Hanna [SBS-MVP]
----------------------------------------
Please only reply in the Newsgroups and not to me directly.
-----------------------------------------
Posted via Windows Mail, on Vista Technical Edition, RC1
"rick" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:B1FB4641-9F13-4140-8C7B-33D151FED6B2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here is the way the network is setup is I have a cable modem, which is
connected to a linksys router which is where my public static ip is, the
lan
side of the router is 10.10.10.1, and I have UPnP Forwarding to
10.10.10.2,
which is the Server's external nic. Thanks again
Ethernet adapter Server External Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : domain.net
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-10-18-1C-51-DC
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.2
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
Ethernet adapter Server Internal Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : domain.net
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network
Connection
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-13-72-FE-48-B8
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
that would be correct
Post your IPCONFIG /all from your server
--
Cris E. Hanna [SBS-MVP]
----------------------------------------
Please only reply in the Newsgroups and not to me directly.
-----------------------------------------
Posted via Windows Mail, on Vista Technical Edition, RC1
"rick" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C1AF5182-891C-4455-A9E2-981C18375379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If I have my router forwarding all requests to my external nic, could
that
be
the problem of why I can't do a dns query on my domain? The ip of my
external nic is 10.10.10.2, and my internal card is 192.168.1.1.
Thanks
"Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
and why is it that we have 3 - 10 security patches every
month...because
every month, a new vulnerability is found...and a patch is created.
and
so
you are up to date for another month. But it doesn't necessarily mean
your
business network is safe from the bad guys. It simply means that
either
no
one has attempted to get to your network via a vulnerabilty that has
yet
to
be patched.'
And its not that Linux or Mac is any more secure, its just that
Windows
has
a bigger target painted on it.
--
Cris E. Hanna [SBS-MVP]
----------------------------------------
Please only reply in the Newsgroups and not to me directly.
-----------------------------------------
Posted via Windows Mail, on Vista Technical Edition, RC1
"Duncan McC" <hard@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f6a6b5f9fd254ec98986e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <3D65F6E9-6046-4CF1-8071-9B0A4FD9DCE9@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
crisnospamhanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
Doesn't matter how many machines you have...hosting a website
inside a
business domain is a terrible idea
Port 80 is the single most attacked port on the internet.
Host a public accessible website and it will be a matter days, if
not
hours,
before your network is compromised and one or more hackers is using
your
network for who knows what
Given it's fully up to date w' patches etc - how does this happen?
What
security holes are there in SBS?, IIS? .NET?
--
Duncan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- References:
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Duncan McC
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: rick
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP]
- Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- Prev by Date: Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- Next by Date: Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- Previous by thread: Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- Next by thread: Re: dns configuration for public static ip
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|